The audit · 24–48h turnaround · Free · 10 a week
A UX audit that tells you what to fix, and in what order.
Send me a URL. I read your website or product flow the way your users do, and send back a PDF report you can act on the same day — a UX score, three critical blockers, and five quick wins. No calls, no code access.
Free for now — normally $149.
What I check
Every audit is a heuristic evaluation run through the same four lenses. The same four on every page, which is what makes the score worth comparing after you ship a change.
-
First impression
What a first-time visitor understands in the first five seconds, and whether the page offers one obvious next step or several competing ones. Most drop-off happens here — before anyone reads a word of your feature list.
-
The path to value
Every step between arriving and the core action: how many there are, which could be deferred, and where a form asks for more than the stage warrants. This is where signups leak quietly.
-
Clarity of copy
Whether the page is written for the reader or for the system behind it. Buttons that do not say what they do, headlines that name a category instead of a benefit, errors that do not say how to recover.
-
Trust and friction
Whether the price is legible, whether reassurances appear at the moment of hesitation, and whether anything asks for more commitment than the visitor is ready to give.
How the four combine into one number — and why it is a judgement rather than a calculation — is set out in the Uxerfy Score. If you are still working out whether an audit is the right instrument at all, start here. The full question list behind them is public too: read the UX audit checklist I run on every page — it sits with the rest of the guides — or download a sample report to see how the findings are written up. To see the lenses applied rather than described, the example libraries annotate real pages a few lines at a time, and the teardowns take one page apart in full.
Audits by product type
The four lenses stay the same; what changes is what counts as friction. Pick the read closest to what you're building:
- SaaS I read your signup, onboarding, and pricing the way a first-time user does, then send back the three things blocking them and the five changes that clear the path.
- E-commerce I follow the path from product page to confirmed order and mark every point where a ready buyer hesitates, gets distracted, or gives up.
- B2B I read your site the way a busy buyer evaluating vendors does, and mark what stands between their interest and a booked demo or a filled form.
- Dev tools I read your docs, onboarding, and pricing the way a developer evaluating your tool at 11pm does, and mark what stands between them and their first successful call.
- AI products I read your product the way a first-time user facing a blank prompt does, and mark what stops them from getting a result they trust and coming back.
- Fintech I read your site and signup the way a cautious person about to trust you with their money does, and mark what erodes that trust or stalls the sign-up.
Audits by page or flow
Or point me at the one page carrying the most weight, and I'll read that decision end to end:
- Pricing pages I read your pricing page the way a buyer comparing plans does, and mark what stalls the one decision the page exists to make.
- Signup flows I go through your signup the way a motivated first-time user does, and mark every field, step, and moment of doubt that stops them from getting in.
- Onboarding I move through your onboarding the way a brand-new user does, and mark what stands between them and the first moment the product actually pays off.
- Checkout I follow your checkout the way a ready buyer does, and mark every point where a confirmed sale slips away at the last moment.
Specialized audits
Two narrower reads, for when you already know which way the problem points:
What a tool won't tell you
Free AI audit tools are genuinely good, and if you have never checked your product you should run one before you talk to anybody. They catch contrast failures, tap targets, heading structure, layout shift and known dark patterns faster and more consistently than a person will.
What no ruleset produces is a finding like "four plans, none marked as recommended" — every column accessible, legible and correctly marked up, and the page still hands the sorting work to a visitor who came here to be told which one is theirs. That needs someone who knows what the page is for, and intent is not in the markup.
Tool, independent or agency sets out what each one is good at, including when the answer is not me.
Before you send a URL
How do I know the score is not just your opinion?
It is a judgement, and I would not pretend otherwise — but it is a structured one. Every page goes through the same four lenses and the same published checklist, and every finding says what I saw and why it costs you, so you can disagree with the reasoning rather than the number. The public teardowns let you check that reasoning before you send anything.
What if I disagree with the findings?
Tell me which one and why. Sometimes you know a constraint I could not see from the outside, and that is useful to both of us. If the read misses the mark because the brief was too vague, I will run it again with a sharper one.
Do you need access to my product or analytics?
No. I read what any visitor can reach. If the flow sits behind a login, send test credentials in the notes field and I will use those and nothing else. I do not need your analytics, your codebase or a call.
How is this different from an automated tool?
Run a free automated tool first — they are good, they are fast, and they will catch contrast, tap targets, heading structure and layout shift more consistently than I will. What a ruleset cannot produce is a finding about intent: that none of your four plans says who it is for, or that the reassurance is in the footer while the doubt is at the button. Every element there is technically correct. The page is still failing at its job, and that is the part I read.
What does it cost?
An audit is $149, and it is free for a limited time while I build a public track record. There is no card, no invoice and no account while it is free, and an audit you have already requested stays free whatever happens to the price. Full detail is on the pricing page.
How long does it actually take?
The report lands within 24–48 hours of your URL arriving. If I am going to miss that, I email you before the deadline, not after.
Why trust this audit
Product designer · Barcelona
Uxerfy is a UX audit service run by one person: send a URL, get back a PDF within 24–48 hours with a score out of 10, three critical blockers and five quick wins. I do every audit myself and put my name on it — here's who I am and how I work.
Verify me on LinkedIn →Here's a complete sample report. No email required — download it and see exactly what lands in your inbox.
Download a sample report (PDF) ↓- A signup form is the one place a product has earned nothing yet. Every question that serves the business rather than the visitor is paid for in people who close the tab — and the question about money is the most expensive one to ask first.
- A headline price is the number the whole relationship is measured against. If the real bill is usage-based, the card has to say so on the page — otherwise the first invoice becomes the moment trust breaks.
- Four undifferentiated columns hand the sorting work to the visitor. One recommended plan and a stated saving do that work for them — and a decision you make easy is a decision that actually gets made.
Let me show you what I'd change first.
One URL is all it takes. You'll have the report within a day or two.
Get a free audit →